Krohnengold v. New York Life Insurance Company

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided November 18, 2022·No. 1:21-cv-01778·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK STUART KROHNENGOLD, et al,

Plaintiffs, Case No. 1:21-cv-01778

v.

NEW YORK LIFE INSURANCE CO., et al.,

Defendants.

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] CONFIDENTIALITY ORDER IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, pursuant to Rule 26(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Rule 502(d) of the Federal Rules of Evidence, by and among Plaintiffs Stuart Krohnengold, Wayne Antoine, Lee Webber, Anthony Medici, Joseph Bendrihem, Larry Gilbert, Rafael Musni, Thomas Lantz, Sandra Scanni, and Claudia Gonzalez (“Plaintiffs”) and Defendants New York Life Insurance Co. (“NY Life”), Fiduciary Investment Committee, Board of Trustees, Katherine O’Brien, Anthony R. Malloy, Yie-Hsin Hung, Arthur A. Seter, Scott L. Lenz, and Robert J. Hynes (“Defendants”) in the above-captioned action (the “Action”), through their undersigned counsel, that the following provisions of this Stipulation and Confidentiality Order (the “Stipulation and Order”) govern disclosure and use by the Parties of all documents, testimony, transcripts, video, audio, exhibits, interrogatory answers, responses to requests for admission, electronically stored information (“ESI”), and any other materials and information (including, to avoid any ambiguity, any copies, summaries, or derivations thereof) produced or provided by the Parties or any non-party during discovery in this Action (collectively, “Discovery Material(s)”). 1. This Stipulation and Order is entered to facilitate the production, exchange, and discovery of Discovery Materials that merit confidential treatment.

2. All Confidential Discovery Materials produced or disclosed in connection with this Action shall be used solely for the prosecution or the defense of this Action (including any appeal therefrom). 3. A Party, non-party, person, or other entity that produces or discloses Discovery Materials in connection with this Action shall be referred to herein as the “Disclosing Party.” 4. A Party, non-party, person, or other entity that receives Discovery Materials in connection with this Action shall be referred to herein as the “Receiving Party.” 5. A Party, non-party, person, or other entity that designates any Material produced in this Action as “Confidential” shall be referred to herein as the “Designator.” 6. “Document” shall have the meaning assigned in Local Rule 26.3, and shall also

include any recorded form of information, whether in printed, electronic, or other format, including deposition transcripts, answers to interrogatories, and other discovery responses. 7. Any Disclosing Party may, subject to the provisions of this Stipulation and Order, designate as “Confidential” any Discovery Material that the Disclosing Party reasonably and in good faith believes contains confidential and/or proprietary business or personal information protected under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c), and that the Disclosing Party would not normally reveal to third parties or would cause third parties to maintain in confidence, and thus requires the protections provided in this Stipulation and Order. Confidential Material may include, inter alia, all non-public materials containing information related to: financial or business plans, data, or projections; proposed plans or strategies; studies or analyses by internal or external experts or consultants; financial or tax data; competitive analyses; organizational charts or lists of personnel; information or documents subject to confidentiality or non-disclosure agreements with third parties; 401(k) participant account data; 401(k) plan design and/or

administration data; other commercially sensitive or proprietary information; or personal financial information or other confidential personal information. 8. Discovery Material designated “Confidential” shall be referred to herein as “Confidential Discovery Material.” No designation of Confidential Discovery (other than with respect to ESI) shall be effective unless there is placed on, or affixed to, the materials (in such manner as will not interfere with the legibility thereof) a “Confidential” stamp, sticker, mark, notice, or the equivalent (collectively, a “Stamp”) or, in the case of depositions, as set forth in Paragraph 15, below. ESI designated as “Confidential” shall be so designated by including a “Confidential” designation or notice in the body of the electronic document or by affixing a Stamp with such notice to the medium (including, but not limited to, tapes, CDs, DVDs, and

flash drives) on which the ESI is stored before copies are delivered to a Receiving Party. Printouts of any such ESI designated as Confidential Discovery Material shall be treated in accordance with the terms of this Stipulation and Order. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Excel documents or any other type of electronically stored information produced in native format (together, “Natively Produced ESI”) need not be produced using a means sufficient to ensure that every page of such document, when printed, contains the appropriate Stamp. Instead, the Disclosing Party shall use reasonable means to designate “Confidential,” by (a) producing a TIFF placeholder image corresponding to the Natively Produced ESI that includes a “Confidential” Stamp; and (b) including “Confidential” on the label of the media or in the transmittal e-mail containing the Natively Produced ESI. 9. The Receiving Party may at any time challenge the designation of one or more Discovery Materials as “Confidential” on the grounds that it or they does not or do not qualify

for protection, or does not or do not qualify for the level of protection initially asserted. If the Disclosing Party or Party-Designator agrees, it shall promptly notify the Receiving Party that it is withdrawing or changing the designation. 10. The designation of any Discovery Material as Confidential is not intended to, and shall not be construed as, an admission that the Discovery Material is relevant, not subject to an applicable privilege or other immunity or protection from disclosure, admissible, or reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. 11. This Stipulation and Order is without prejudice to the right of any Disclosing Party or Designator to assert that any Discovery Material is subject to any applicable claim of privilege or protection (collectively referred to as “privilege[s]”), and is without prejudice to any

other Party’s right to contest such a claim of privilege. 12. The inadvertent production of any Discovery Material in this Action shall be without prejudice to any claim that such material is privileged, and no Party shall have waived any claims or arguments by virtue of the inadvertent production of Discovery Material. In order to claw back Discovery Material purportedly protected from disclosure by privilege that was produced inadvertently, the parties must promptly do as follows: (a) The Disclosing Party must provide notice in writing to the Receiving Party specifying the Bates number of (or otherwise identifying with sufficient specificity) the Discovery Material it wishes to claw back, and the basis of the claim of privilege relied upon in support of its claw-back request; (b) The Receiving Party must use reasonable efforts to destroy or return to the Disclosing Party all copies of the inadvertently produced Discovery Materials in its possession,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Krohnengold v. New York Life Insurance Company, (S.D.N.Y. 2022).

Krohnengold v. New York Life Insurance Company (Krohnengold v. New York Life Insurance Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga
435 F.3d 110 (Second Circuit, 2006)