Krohn v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Krohn v. State

845 So. 2d 961, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 6669, 2003 WL 21014041

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 7, 2003

DocketNo. 4D02-437

StatusPublished

This text of 845 So. 2d 961 (Krohn v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Krohn v. State, 845 So. 2d 961, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 6669, 2003 WL 21014041 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this appeal, the public defender has filed a motion to withdraw pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and the appellant has filed a pro se initial brief alleging three grounds of ineffective assistance of counsel in failing to correct score-sheet error as well as trial court error in sentencing appellant pursuant to an incorrect scoresheet. The revocation of appellant’s probation and his sentences are affirmed, without prejudice to his raising grounds of ineffective assistance of counsel and scoresheet error by a timely and proper postconviction motion pursuant to rule 3.800(a) and/or rule 3.850, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure.

POLEN, C.J., STONE and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In this appeal, the public defender has filed a motion to withdraw pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and the appellant has filed a pro se initial brief alleging three grounds of ineffective assistance of counsel in failing to correct score-sheet error as well as trial court error in sentencing appellant pursuant to an incorrect scoresheet. The revocation of appellant’s probation and his sentences are affirmed, without prejudice to his raising grounds of ineffective assistance of counsel and scoresheet error by a timely and proper postconviction motion pursuant to rule 3.800(a) and/or rule 3.850, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure.

POLEN, C.J., STONE and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

845 So. 2d 961, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 6669, 2003 WL 21014041, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/krohn-v-state-fladistctapp-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack