Krohn v. Silverman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Krohn v. Silverman

240 A.D. 911

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 15, 1933

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 240 A.D. 911 (Krohn v. Silverman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Krohn v. Silverman, 240 A.D. 911 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1933).

Pincite

Opinion

Order denying motion for leave to sue receiver reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs to the appellant to abide the event. In our opinion, the existence of a cause of action is sufficiently indicated. The character of the receivership and the question of the liability of the receiver for the injuries to the infant should await the pleadings or the trial. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Carswell and Tompkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order denying motion for leave to sue receiver reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs to the appellant to abide the event. In our opinion, the existence of a cause of action is sufficiently indicated. The character of the receivership and the question of the liability of the receiver for the injuries to the infant should await the pleadings or the trial. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Carswell and Tompkins, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

240 A.D. 911, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/krohn-v-silverman-nyappdiv-1933.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack