Krohn v. Reclamation District No. 17
This text of 37 Cal. App. 818 (Krohn v. Reclamation District No. 17) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This action was brought to prevent the sale of the property of plaintiffs to enforce the lien of a reclamation tax and is a companion ease to Spurrier v. Neumiller, etc., ante, p. 683, [174 Pac. 338], It is conceded that the decisive question is the same in the two appeals, and that is, whether the land should be credited with the payment of said invalid assessment. Having reached the conclusion that the lower court was correct in holding that no such credit should be given, it follows that we should affirm the judgment in this case, and it is so ordered.
Chipman, P. J., and Hart, J., concurred.
A petition to have the cause heard in the supreme court, after judgment in the district court of appeal, was denied by the supreme court on. August 26, 1918.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
37 Cal. App. 818, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/krohn-v-reclamation-district-no-17-calctapp-1918.