Krogstad v. Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance

South Dakota Supreme Court

Krogstad v. Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance

261 N.W. 758, 63 S.D. 541

CourtSouth Dakota Supreme Court

DecidedJune 25, 1935

DocketFile No. 7815

StatusPublished

This text of 261 N.W. 758 (Krogstad v. Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering South Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Krogstad v. Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance, 261 N.W. 758, 63 S.D. 541 (S.D. 1935).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellants filed in this court a certified copy of notice of appeal on the ninth day of March, 1935. Respondent, the Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company, a corporation, of Milwaukee, Wis., on the sixth day of June, 1935, obtained an order to show cause why the appeal should not be dismissed upon the ground that no undertaking upon appeal had been served or filed as required by statute (Rev. Code 1919, § 3146), and that the court is without jurisdiction to entertain said appeal. Said motion was based upon an affidavit substantiating the fact that no proper undertaking had been served or filed. Appellants have failed to answer, and have made no showing why the appeal should not be dismissed.

After a careful consideration of the record, it is the opinion of the court that the appeal be, and it is hereby, dismissed.

All the Judges concur, except RUDOLPH, J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellants filed in this court a certified copy of notice of appeal on the ninth day of March, 1935. Respondent, the Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company, a corporation, of Milwaukee, Wis., on the sixth day of June, 1935, obtained an order to show cause why the appeal should not be dismissed upon the ground that no undertaking upon appeal had been served or filed as required by statute (Rev. Code 1919, § 3146), and that the court is without jurisdiction to entertain said appeal. Said motion was based upon an affidavit substantiating the fact that no proper undertaking had been served or filed. Appellants have failed to answer, and have made no showing why the appeal should not be dismissed.

After a careful consideration of the record, it is the opinion of the court that the appeal be, and it is hereby, dismissed.

All the Judges concur, except RUDOLPH, J., absent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

261 N.W. 758, 63 S.D. 541, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/krogstad-v-northwestern-mutual-life-insurance-sd-1935.