Krogman v. State
884 S.W.2d 339, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1353, 1994 WL 449750
Opinion
Appellant pled guilty to two counts of rape and one count of sodomy. He received three concurrent twelve-year sentences.
In his Rule 24.035 motion, appellate alleges error in accepting his pleas. The motion [340]*340court denied Ms request for relief -without an evidentiary hearing.
No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. The motion court’s findings are not clearly erroneous and no error of law appears. Pursuant to Rule 84.16(b), the judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Krogman v. State, 884 S.W.2d 339, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1353, 1994 WL 449750 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994).
884 S.W.2d 339 (Krogman v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.