Home/Supreme Court of Alabama/Kroger ex rel. Kroger v. Davis

Kroger ex rel. Kroger v. Davis

622 So. 2d 303, 1993 Ala. LEXIS 361
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedApril 9, 1993
Docket1911253
StatusPublished

This text of 622 So. 2d 303 (Kroger ex rel. Kroger v. Davis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kroger ex rel. Kroger v. Davis, 622 So. 2d 303, 1993 Ala. LEXIS 361 (Ala. 1993).

Opinion

ALMON, Justice.

Tatum Kroger, a second grade student, was injured by another student or students [304]*304on a school playground during recess. She and her father brought an action against the two schoolteachers who were supervising the students during recess. In supervising the students during recess, the defendant teachers were performing a discretionary function and are therefore immune from liability. Nance v. Matthews, 622 So.2d 297 (Ala.1993). The summary judgment for the defendants is affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

HORNSBY, C.J., and ADAMS, STEAGALL and INGRAM, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Nance by and Through Nance v. Matthews
622 So. 2d 297 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
622 So. 2d 303, 1993 Ala. LEXIS 361, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kroger-ex-rel-kroger-v-davis-ala-1993.