Kroger Co. v. Hicks
265 S.E.2d 59, 153 Ga. App. 153, 1980 Ga. App. LEXIS 1718
Opinion
Contrary to appellant Kroger’s contention, there was evidence adduced at trial which would support a jury determination that Kroger was negligent in allowing appellee Hicks to slip and fall, breaking her hip, in a pool of water on the floor of its store. There is thus no merit in appellant’s sole enumeration of error, asserting that the trial court should have granted its motion for directed verdict, and we affirm the court’s denial of the motion.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kroger Co. v. Hicks, 265 S.E.2d 59, 153 Ga. App. 153, 1980 Ga. App. LEXIS 1718 (Ga. Ct. App. 1980).
265 S.E.2d 59 (Kroger Co. v. Hicks) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.