Krog v. Koahou

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Krog v. Koahou. Read the opinion of the Court — 133 Haw. 186
Hawaii Supreme Court·Decided October 4, 2013·No. SCWC-12-0000315·Published

Opinion

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCWC-12-0000315

04-OCT-2013

SCWC-12-0000315 01:53 PM

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I

DONALD EDWARD KROG, in his capacity as Trustee of the Donald Edward Krog Living Trust, Dated March 25, 2010, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs.

ELEANA UMILANI KOAHOU and YVONNE MOKIHANA KEAHI, Petitioners/Defendants-Appellants.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-12-0000315; CIV. NO. 11-1-1697-08)

ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Nakayama, Acting C.J., Acoba, McKenna, and Pollack, JJ. and Circuit Judge Nacino, in place of Recktenwald, C.J., recused)

Petitioners/Defendants-Appellants’ Application for Writ of Certiorari, filed on August 21, 2013, is hereby accepted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that no oral argument will be heard in this case. Any party may, within ten days and pursuant

to Rule 34(c) of the Hawai'i Rules of Appellate Procedure, move for retention of oral argument.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, October 4, 2013.

Gary Victor Dubin, /s/ Paula A. Nakayama

Frederick J. Arensmeyer, and Zeina Jafar /s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr. for petitioners /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

Theodore D.C. Young, Andrew G. Odell, /s/ Richard W. Pollack Wayne Nasser, Kevin W. Herring and Steven R. /s/ Edwin C. Nacino Gray for respondent

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Krog v. Koahou, (haw 2013).

Krog v. Koahou (Krog v. Koahou) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.