Kroft v. McDowell

636 So. 2d 185, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 4148, 1994 WL 159815
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 3, 1994·No. No. 93-3103·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks review of a final order which denied her request for an award of interest which had accrued through the date of the trial court’s order determining that appellee was in arrears in his child support obligation in the amount of $10,452.50. Appellant was clearly entitled to interest on each overdue payment from the date it became due until the date of the order determining the amount of the arrearage. E.g., Romans v. Romans, 611 So.2d 92 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992); Holt v. Holt, 596 So.2d 106 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992); Applegate v. Applegate, 566 So.2d 865 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990). Accordingly, we reverse and remand with directions that the trial court award appellant interest on the past-due child support obligations from the date that each became due to the date of its order determining the amount of the ar-rearage.

REVERSED and REMANDED, with directions.

BOOTH, WOLF and WEBSTER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kroft v. McDowell, 636 So. 2d 185, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 4148, 1994 WL 159815 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

636 So. 2d 185 (Kroft v. McDowell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Applegate v. Applegate
566 So. 2d 865 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
Holt v. Holt
596 So. 2d 106 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
Romans v. Romans
611 So. 2d 92 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)