Kroesen v. New Castle Electric Street Railway Co.

47 A. 851, 198 Pa. 30, 1901 Pa. LEXIS 728
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided January 7, 1901·No. No. 2; Appeal, No. 79·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Fell,

This appeal was argued with No. 78 in which the opinion of the court, deciding that there was sufficient evidence of the motorman’s negligence to take the case to the jury, has been filed. The testimony was the same in both cases and we find nothing in it which would warrant the withdrawal of the case from the jury on the ground that the plaintiff was negligent in not selecting a proper caretaker for his child or that the person in whose care she was placed was under the circumstances negligent.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kroesen v. New Castle Electric Street Railway Co., 47 A. 851, 198 Pa. 30, 1901 Pa. LEXIS 728 (Pa. 1901).

47 A. 851 (Kroesen v. New Castle Electric Street Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Stodd v. City of Philadelphia
183 F. 659 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania, 1910)
Gress v. Philadelphia & Reading Railway Co.
77 A. 810 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1910)
Murray v. Scranton Railway Co.
36 Pa. Super. 576 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1908)