Kroese v. Meyer

18 A.D.2d 909, 238 N.Y.S.2d 56, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4292

Opinion

Order, entered on October 18, 1962, granting application for inspection of books and records of a business trust (Massachusetts trust), unanimously reversed on the law, with $20 costs and disbursements to appellants, and the motion denied, and respondents’ cross motion to dismiss the petition granted. The business entity not being incorporated, the usual remedies available to a stockholder under article 78 of the Civil Practice Act provides no foundation for the relief sought (Matter of Newman, v. Smith, 263 App. Div. 85, 88, affd. 289 N. Y. 545). Without reaching the question whether article 79 of the Civil Practice Act is available it is patent on the record that petitioner-respondent did not follow the correct procedure (Civ. Prae. Act, §§ 1308, 1309). Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Yalente, Steuer and Bastow, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kroese v. Meyer, 18 A.D.2d 909, 238 N.Y.S.2d 56, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4292 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1963).

18 A.D.2d 909 (Kroese v. Meyer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Matter of Newman v. Smith
43 N.E.2d 527 (New York Court of Appeals, 1942)
Newman v. Smith
263 A.D. 85 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1941)