Kroemer v. Tantillo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Kroemer v. Tantillo

305 A.D.2d 1038, 758 N.Y.S.2d 882

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 2, 2003

DocketAppeal No. 1

StatusPublished

This text of 305 A.D.2d 1038 (Kroemer v. Tantillo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kroemer v. Tantillo, 305 A.D.2d 1038, 758 N.Y.S.2d 882 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal from an order of Supreme Court, Ontario County (Galloway, J.), entered April 23, 2002, which, inter alia, granted defendant’s cross motion for summary judgment and dismissed the complaint.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs for the reasons stated at Supreme Court, Ontario County, Galloway, J. Present — Pigott, Jr., P.J., Green, Wisner, Bums and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal from an order of Supreme Court, Ontario County (Galloway, J.), entered April 23, 2002, which, inter alia, granted defendant’s cross motion for summary judgment and dismissed the complaint.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs for the reasons stated at Supreme Court, Ontario County, Galloway, J. Present — Pigott, Jr., P.J., Green, Wisner, Bums and Lawton, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

305 A.D.2d 1038, 758 N.Y.S.2d 882, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kroemer-v-tantillo-nyappdiv-2003.