Kriz v. Long Island Jewish-Hillside Medical Center

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Kriz v. Long Island Jewish-Hillside Medical Center

123 A.D.2d 669, 506 N.Y.S.2d 958, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 60819

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 14, 1986

StatusPublished

This text of 123 A.D.2d 669 (Kriz v. Long Island Jewish-Hillside Medical Center) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kriz v. Long Island Jewish-Hillside Medical Center, 123 A.D.2d 669, 506 N.Y.S.2d 958, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 60819 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

In a medical malpractice action, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Kelly, J.), dated September 24, 1985, which granted the motion of the defendants Welch and Fried to dismiss the complaint as to them unless the plaintiff submitted proof of a lost letter search conducted by the U. S. Post Office with respect to a letter allegedly mailed by her. The appeal brings up for review an order of the same court, dated November 4, 1985, which denied the plaintiff’s motion for renewal (CPLR 5517 [b]).

Ordered that the order dated November 4, 1985 is reversed, without costs or disbursements, and, upon renewal, the order dated September 24, 1985 is vacated, and the motion of the defendants Welch and Fried to dismiss the complaint as to them is denied.

Under all the circumstances, Special Term erred in conditionally dismissing the complaint. Lazer, J. P., Mangano, Bracken and Niehoff, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a medical malpractice action, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Kelly, J.), dated September 24, 1985, which granted the motion of the defendants Welch and Fried to dismiss the complaint as to them unless the plaintiff submitted proof of a lost letter search conducted by the U. S. Post Office with respect to a letter allegedly mailed by her. The appeal brings up for review an order of the same court, dated November 4, 1985, which denied the plaintiff’s motion for renewal (CPLR 5517 [b]).

Ordered that the order dated November 4, 1985 is reversed, without costs or disbursements, and, upon renewal, the order dated September 24, 1985 is vacated, and the motion of the defendants Welch and Fried to dismiss the complaint as to them is denied.

Under all the circumstances, Special Term erred in conditionally dismissing the complaint. Lazer, J. P., Mangano, Bracken and Niehoff, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

123 A.D.2d 669, 506 N.Y.S.2d 958, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 60819, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kriz-v-long-island-jewish-hillside-medical-center-nyappdiv-1986.