Kritz v. O'Meara

300 A.D.2d 548, 752 N.Y.S.2d 570

This text of 300 A.D.2d 548 (Kritz v. O'Meara) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kritz v. O'Meara, 300 A.D.2d 548, 752 N.Y.S.2d 570 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

—In an action to recover on a promissory note brought by motion for summary judgment in. lieu of complaint pursuant to CPLR 3213, the defendant appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Austin, J.), entered June 27, 2001, which, upon an order of the same court, dated June 18, 2001, granting the motion, is in favor of the plaintiff and against her in the principal sum of $50,000.

Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, with costs, the order is vacated, and the motion is denied (see Russo v O’Meara, 300 AD2d 563 [decided herewith]). Santucci, J.P., Smith, Goldstein, H. Miller and Mastro, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Russo v. O'Meara
300 A.D.2d 563 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
300 A.D.2d 548, 752 N.Y.S.2d 570, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kritz-v-omeara-nyappdiv-2002.