Kristy Frye v. American College of Radiology
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 20-1604
KRISTY FRYE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Anthony John Trenga, Senior District Judge. (1:19-cv-00080-AJT-IDD)
Submitted: January 24, 2022 Decided: February 1, 2022
Before NIEMEYER and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kristy Frye, Appellant Pro Se. Jeffrey Brian Hardie, Thomas Patrick Murphy, Jason Alexander Ross, JACKSON LEWIS PC, Reston, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Kristy Frye appeals the district court’s orders granting summary judgment in favor
of her former employer, the American College of Radiology, on Frye’s claims under the
Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993, 29 U.S.C. §§ 2601 to 2654, and the Americans
with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101 to 12213, and denying Frye leave to file an
amended complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Frye v. Am. Coll. of Radiology, No. 1:19-
cv-00080-AJT-IDD (E.D. Va. Mar. 11, 2020; April 27, 2020). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kristy Frye v. American College of Radiology (Kristy Frye v. American College of Radiology) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.