Kristopher Lee Madson v. State of Florida
This text of Kristopher Lee Madson v. State of Florida (Kristopher Lee Madson v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________
No. 1D2022-4013 _____________________________
KRISTOPHER LEE MADSON,
Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee. _____________________________
On appeal from the Circuit Court for Alachua County. James M. Colaw, Judge.
December 6, 2023
PER CURIAM.
Because the direct appeal was already pending with this Court (1D22-3299), the trial court lacked jurisdiction to decide the merits of Appellant’s rule 3.800(a) motion. See Lowe v. State, 152 So. 3d 1279, 1280 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015) (“[W]e quash the orders denying the motion because the trial court lacked jurisdiction to rule on the motion while the direct appeal of Appellant’s judgment and sentence in these cases was pending in this court.”).
ORDER QUASHED.
ROBERTS, ROWE, and LONG, JJ., concur. _____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________
Kristopher Lee Madson, pro se, Appellant.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Adam B. Wilson, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Kristopher Lee Madson v. State of Florida, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kristopher-lee-madson-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2023.