Kristofer Thomas Kastner v. Texas Workforce Commission,Rosehill Enterprises, L.L.C. Dba Houston Admiral Services

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided November 14, 2013·No. 01-13-00274-CV·Published

Opinion

Opinion issued November 14, 2013.

In The

Court of Appeals For The

First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-13-00274-CV ——————————— KRISTOFER THOMAS KASTNER, Appellant V. TEXAS WORKFORCE COMMISSION AND ROSEHILL ENTERPRISES, L.L.C. DBA HOUSTON ADMIRAL SERVICES, Appellees

On Appeal from the 165th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 2011-76848

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Kristofer Thomas Kastner, has neither paid the required fees nor

established indigence for purposes of appellate costs. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 20.1;

see also TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 51.207, § 51.941(a), § 101.041 (West 2013); Order Regarding Fees Charged in Civil Cases in the Supreme Court and the Courts

of Appeals and Before the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, Misc. Docket

No. 07-9138 (Tex. Aug. 28, 2007), reprinted in TEX. R. APP. P. App. A § B(1).

After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant did not

adequately respond. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5; 42.3(c).

We dismiss the appeal for nonpayment of all required fees. We dismiss any

pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Sharp, and Brown.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kristofer Thomas Kastner v. Texas Workforce Commission,Rosehill Enterprises, L.L.C. Dba Houston Admiral Services, (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

Kristofer Thomas Kastner v. Texas Workforce Commission,Rosehill Enterprises, L.L.C. Dba Houston Admiral Services (Kristofer Thomas Kastner v. Texas Workforce Commission,Rosehill Enterprises, L.L.C. Dba Houston Admiral Services) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.