Kristofer Thomas Kastner v. Texas Workforce Commission,Rosehill Enterprises, L.L.C. Dba Houston Admiral Services
Opinion
Opinion issued November 14, 2013.
In The
Court of Appeals For The
First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-13-00274-CV ——————————— KRISTOFER THOMAS KASTNER, Appellant V. TEXAS WORKFORCE COMMISSION AND ROSEHILL ENTERPRISES, L.L.C. DBA HOUSTON ADMIRAL SERVICES, Appellees
On Appeal from the 165th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 2011-76848
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant, Kristofer Thomas Kastner, has neither paid the required fees nor
established indigence for purposes of appellate costs. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 20.1;
see also TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 51.207, § 51.941(a), § 101.041 (West 2013); Order Regarding Fees Charged in Civil Cases in the Supreme Court and the Courts
of Appeals and Before the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, Misc. Docket
No. 07-9138 (Tex. Aug. 28, 2007), reprinted in TEX. R. APP. P. App. A § B(1).
After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant did not
adequately respond. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5; 42.3(c).
We dismiss the appeal for nonpayment of all required fees. We dismiss any
pending motions as moot.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Sharp, and Brown.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kristofer Thomas Kastner v. Texas Workforce Commission,Rosehill Enterprises, L.L.C. Dba Houston Admiral Services (Kristofer Thomas Kastner v. Texas Workforce Commission,Rosehill Enterprises, L.L.C. Dba Houston Admiral Services) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.