Kristine Dawn Martin v. the State of Texas

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedSeptember 29, 2022
Docket04-22-00605-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Kristine Dawn Martin v. the State of Texas (Kristine Dawn Martin v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kristine Dawn Martin v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2022).

Opinion

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas September 29, 2022

No. 04-22-00605-CR

Kristine Dawn MARTIN, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 25th Judicial District Court, Guadalupe County, Texas Trial Court No. 18-0059-CR-B Honorable Gary L. Steel, Judge Presiding

ORDER Appellant Kristine Dawn Martin entered into a plea bargain with the State, pursuant to which she pleaded guilty to the charged offense. The trial court imposed a sentence on July 7, 2021 in accordance with the agreement and signed a certificate stating this “is a plea-bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). The clerk’s record includes the written plea bargain agreement. See id. 25.2(d). This court must dismiss an appeal “if a certification that shows the defendant has the right of appeal has not been made part of the record.” Id. The record establishes the punishment assessed by the court does not exceed the punishment recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant. See id. 25.2(a)(2). The record also appears to support the trial court’s certification that Appellant does not have a right to appeal. See Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (holding court of appeals should review clerk’s record to determine whether trial court’s certification is accurate).

The record further shows Appellant did not file a motion for new trial. Therefore, a notice of appeal was due August 6, 2021, or the notice and a motion for extension of time to file, were due fifteen days later on August 21, 2021. TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a)(1), 26.3. The record contains a notice of appeal file stamped September 12, 2022. See id. 26.3.

Having reviewed the record, it appears appellant does not have the right to appeal and the notice of appeal was untimely filed. We therefore order appellant to file a response, by October 19, 2022, establishing: (1) the notice of appeal was timely filed and (2) an amended certification showing she has the right to appeal has been made part of the appellate record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d), 37.1; see also Ater v. Eighth Court of Appeals, 802 S.W.2d 241 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991) (out-of-time appeal from final felony conviction may be sought by filing writ of habeas corpus pursuant to article 11.07 of Texas Code of Criminal Procedure).

If a supplemental clerk’s record is required to show the appeal is timely and appellant has the right to appeal, appellant must request a supplemental record from the trial court clerk and file a copy of the request with this court. If appellant fails to satisfactorily respond to this order within the time provided, the appeal will be dismissed.

We order all appellate deadlines suspended until further order of the court. We further order the clerk of this court to serve copies of this order on the attorneys of record and the court reporter.

_________________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 29th day of September, 2022.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dears v. State
154 S.W.3d 610 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2005)
Ater v. Eighth Court of Appeals
802 S.W.2d 241 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Kristine Dawn Martin v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kristine-dawn-martin-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2022.