KRISTIN PERRY v. EDMUND G. BROWN, Jr.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided August 6, 2013·No. 10-16696·Published

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

KRISTIN M. PERRY ; SANDRA B. No. 10-16696 STIER; PAUL T. KATAMI; JEFFREY J. ZARRILLO , D.C. No.

Plaintiffs-Appellees, 3:09-cv-02292-

VRW

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO , Intervenor-Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

EDMUND G. BROWN , JR., in his official capacity as Governor of California; KAMALA D. HARRIS, in her official capacity as Attorney General of California; MARK B. HORTON , in his official capacity as Director of the California Department of Public Health & State Registrar of Vital Statistics; LINETTE SCOTT , in her official capacity as Deputy Director of Health Information & Strategic Planning for the California Department of Public Health; PATRICK O’CONNELL, in his official capacity as Clerk-Recorder for the County of Alameda; DEAN C.

2 PERRY V . BROWN

LOGAN , in his official capacity as Registrar-Recorder/County Clerk for the County of Los Angeles, Defendants,

HAK-SHING WILLIAM TAM , Intervenor-Defendant,

and

DENNIS HOLLINGSWORTH ; GAIL J. KNIGHT ; MARTIN F. GUTIERREZ; MARK A. JANSSON ; PROTECT MARRIAGE.COM - YES ON 8, A PROJECT OF CALIFORNIA RENEWAL, as official proponents of Proposition 8, Intervenor-Defendants-Appellants.

KRISTIN M. PERRY ; SANDRA B. No. 11-16577 STIER; PAUL T. KATAMI; JEFFREY J. ZARRILLO , D.C. No.

Plaintiffs-Appellees, 3:09-cv-02292-

JW

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO , Intervenor-Plaintiff-Appellee, ORDER

v.

EDMUND G. BROWN , JR., in his official capacity as Governor of

PERRY V . BROWN 3

California; KAMALA D. HARRIS, in her official capacity as Attorney General of California; MARK B. HORTON , in his official capacity as Director of the California Department of Public Health & State Registrar of Vital Statistics; LINETTE SCOTT , in her official capacity as Deputy Director of Health Information & Strategic Planning for the California Department of Public Health; PATRICK O’CONNELL, in his official capacity as Clerk-Recorder for the County of Alameda; DEAN C. LOGAN , in his official capacity as Registrar-Recorder/County Clerk for the County of Los Angeles, Defendants,

HAK-SHING WILLIAM TAM , Intervenor-Defendant,

and

DENNIS HOLLINGSWORTH ; GAIL J. KNIGHT ; MARTIN F. GUTIERREZ; MARK A. JANSSON ; PROTECT MARRIAGE.COM - YES ON 8, A PROJECT OF CALIFORNIA RENEWAL, as official proponents of Proposition 8, Intervenor-Defendants-Appellants.

4 PERRY V . BROWN

On Remand From The United States Supreme Court

Filed August 6, 2013

Before: Stephen Reinhardt, Michael Daly Hawkins, and N. Randy Smith, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

In accordance with the Supreme Court’s opinion of June 26, 2013 as well as the resulting judgment, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. The clerk is directed to issue the mandate forthwith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

KRISTIN PERRY v. EDMUND G. BROWN, Jr., (9th Cir. 2013).

KRISTIN PERRY v. EDMUND G. BROWN, Jr. (KRISTIN PERRY v. EDMUND G. BROWN, Jr.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.