Kristian Michael Wright v. the State of Texas

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJuly 12, 2022
Docket05-22-00482-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Kristian Michael Wright v. the State of Texas (Kristian Michael Wright v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kristian Michael Wright v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2022).

Opinion

Order entered July 12, 2022

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-22-00482-CR

KRISTIAN MICHAEL WRIGHT, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 354th District Court Hunt County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 33838CR

ORDER

Appellant filed her timely notice of appeal on May 20, 2022. Before the

Court is court reporter Shannon Sudderth’s July 11, 2022 request for additional

time to file the record. The motion states that Ms. Sudderth is not working on the

record because no payment arrangements have been made.

It is not clear from the clerk’s record whether appellant has been declared

indigent for purposes of the appellate record. Although appellate counsel stated in

his June 23, 2022 motion to substitute that he was retained by appellant’s family, a criminal appellant may be represented by retained counsel yet be indigent for

purposes of appeal, particularly when someone other than the appellant is paying

for counsel.

Therefore, we ORDER the trial court to hold a hearing to determine whether

appellant is indigent for purposes of this appeal and to file, within FIFTEEN

DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER, findings regarding appellant’s status

(i.e., whether appellant is indigent or not indigent for purposes of this appeal). The

Court will defer ruling on Ms. Sudderth’s request until the findings are filed.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order to the Honorable Keli

Aiken, Presiding Judge, 354th Judicial District Court; to court reporter Shannon

Sudderth; and to counsel for all parties.

We ABATE this appeal for the trial court to hold a hearing and make

appropriate findings. The appeal will be reinstated when the findings are filed or

when the Court determines it appropriate to do so.

/s/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Kristian Michael Wright v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kristian-michael-wright-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2022.