Kristansen v. Steinfeldt

New York Supreme Court

Kristansen v. Steinfeldt

165 Misc. 575, 300 N.Y.S. 543, 1937 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1955

CourtNew York Supreme Court

DecidedNovember 5, 1937

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 165 Misc. 575 (Kristansen v. Steinfeldt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kristansen v. Steinfeldt, 165 Misc. 575, 300 N.Y.S. 543, 1937 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1955 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1937).

Pincite

Opinion

Brower, J.

Although the negligent acts and omissions complained of took place within the territorial limits of the State of [576]*576New York, the explosion resulting in the death of plaintiff’s intestate occurred on the high seas. The great preponderance of authority is to the effect that the locus delicti,- for the purpose of determining what law governs an action for wrongful death, is fixed, not by the place where the defendant acted and the negligence occurred, but by the place where the force impinged on the body of decedent. (Kelly v. Steinfeldt, N. Y. L. J. Oct. 30, 1937, p. 1435; 2 Whart. Confl. of Laws, 1130; 2 Beale Confl. of Laws, 1305; Restatement of the Law of Conflict of Laws, § 391. See same, N. Y. Annotations, § 377. Cf. Smith v. Lampe, [C. C. A.] 64 F. [2d] 201; certiorari den ed, 289 U. S. 751; 53 S. Ct. 695; 77 L. Ed. 1496; The Haxby, [D. C.] 95 Fed. 170.)

This court, therefore, feels constrained to hold that the Federal Death Act.(U. S. Code, tit. 46, §§ 761-768) is applicable to the case at bar; and as it covers the entire field of liability and confers jurisdiction over actions arising thereunder only upon the District Courts of the United States in admiralty, it follows that this court has not jurisdiction of the subject of the causes of action alleged against the moving defendant.

Motion to strike out the second and third causes of action granted. Settle order on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brower, J.

Although the negligent acts and omissions complained of took place within the territorial limits of the State of [576]*576New York, the explosion resulting in the death of plaintiff’s intestate occurred on the high seas. The great preponderance of authority is to the effect that the locus delicti,- for the purpose of determining what law governs an action for wrongful death, is fixed, not by the place where the defendant acted and the negligence occurred, but by the place where the force impinged on the body of decedent. (Kelly v. Steinfeldt, N. Y. L. J. Oct. 30, 1937, p. 1435; 2 Whart. Confl. of Laws, 1130; 2 Beale Confl. of Laws, 1305; Restatement of the Law of Conflict of Laws, § 391. See same, N. Y. Annotations, § 377. Cf. Smith v. Lampe, [C. C. A.] 64 F. [2d] 201; certiorari den ed, 289 U. S. 751; 53 S. Ct. 695; 77 L. Ed. 1496; The Haxby, [D. C.] 95 Fed. 170.)

This court, therefore, feels constrained to hold that the Federal Death Act.(U. S. Code, tit. 46, §§ 761-768) is applicable to the case at bar; and as it covers the entire field of liability and confers jurisdiction over actions arising thereunder only upon the District Courts of the United States in admiralty, it follows that this court has not jurisdiction of the subject of the causes of action alleged against the moving defendant.

Motion to strike out the second and third causes of action granted. Settle order on notice.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

165 Misc. 575, 300 N.Y.S. 543, 1937 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1955, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kristansen-v-steinfeldt-nysupct-1937.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack