Kristan Smith v. Woodlen Glen Apartments
This text of Kristan Smith v. Woodlen Glen Apartments (Kristan Smith v. Woodlen Glen Apartments) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
on 1/13/2015 2:14:33 PM
OFFICE OF STAN STANART FILED IN COUNTY CLERK, HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS 1st COURT OF APPEALS CIVIL COURTS DEPARTMENT HOUSTON, TEXAS 1/13/2015 2:17:29 PM January 13, 2015 CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk Court of Appeals 301 Fannin Houston, Texas 77002
LETTER OF ASSIGNMENT Court Docket Number: 1056192 Trial Court Number: One (1)
Style: KRISTAN SMITH VS. WOODLEN GLEN APTS APPELLANT(S) APPELLEE(S)
Judge: DEBRA IBARRA MAYFIELD I Appellant(s) Attorney: Appellee(s) Attorney: Smith, Pro Se Ernie #24072106 8405 Broadway #166 616 FM 1960 West, Suite 105 Houston, Texas 77061 Houston, Texas 77090 Phone: (832) 974-7529 Phone: (832) 305-7694 Fax: N/A Fax (832) 553-2984 N/A N/A
Kristan Smith, appellant, filed a of Appeal on 13, 2015 from the Final Judgment that was signed on January 5, 2015.
The Clerk’s Record is due to your office on or before 6, 2015.
/S/Joshua Alegria Joshua Alegria Deputy Clerk P.O. Box 1525 Houston, TX 77251-1525 (713)
1525 I TX 77251-1525 I (713)
1 1
1 I0
COURT NO.
DEFENDANT:
DATE: SIGNATURE:|
PRINT NAME:
ADDRESS: (STREET) (CITY) (STATE) (ZIP)
PHONE: N0. H-O1-60(Rcv.O1/01/2011)
2 A A A AA A
to be A best
at
3 "CLOSED" 1056192 NO. GLEN WOODLEN § INTHE APARTMENTS COUNTYCOURT CIVIL § v. ATLAWNo. 1
KRISTANSMITH § § HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS
FINAL JUDGMENT |ourt On thiscasefortrial.
Plaintiff, Woodlen Glen Apartments, throughits attorneyof record, and Defendant,
Kristan Smith, appeared, and both parties announced ready for trial.
The Court determined that it had over the parties and subject matter of this case.
The parties waived their rights to a trial byjury and submittedall in controversy,both
factual and legal, to the
TheCourthas consideredthepleadingsandrecordson inthiscauseandtheevidenceand
is of the opinion that judgment should be rendered for
It is accordingly ORDERED that |, Plaintiff, recover from Kristan
Smith, Defendant,judgment for-
1. Possession of the premises commonly known as 8405 Broadway # 166, Houston,
Texas 77061;
2. $ · · amount due in· back as the principal
3. $500.00 as fees;
4.Courtinthe costs of$111.00; amount &
4 ·
5. Interest at the rate of 5.00%, compounded from the date of this judgment,
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a writ of possession may issue on or after
2015. , IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the judgment of this court may not be stayed
within l0 days from this judgment the Defendant files a supersedeas bond in the amount of
pursuant to 24.007 of the Texas Property Code.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff is entitled to enforce this judgment through
abstract, execution, writ, and any other process.
This judgment disposes of all parties and all claims and is appealable.
o| Signed
JUDGE PRESIDING
' .
. _ O of or
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Kristan Smith v. Woodlen Glen Apartments, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kristan-smith-v-woodlen-glen-apartments-texapp-2015.