Kristan Smith v. Woodlen Glen Apartments

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 13, 2015
Docket01-15-00059-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Kristan Smith v. Woodlen Glen Apartments (Kristan Smith v. Woodlen Glen Apartments) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kristan Smith v. Woodlen Glen Apartments, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

on 1/13/2015 2:14:33 PM

OFFICE OF STAN STANART FILED IN COUNTY CLERK, HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS 1st COURT OF APPEALS CIVIL COURTS DEPARTMENT HOUSTON, TEXAS 1/13/2015 2:17:29 PM January 13, 2015 CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk Court of Appeals 301 Fannin Houston, Texas 77002

LETTER OF ASSIGNMENT Court Docket Number: 1056192 Trial Court Number: One (1)

Style: KRISTAN SMITH VS. WOODLEN GLEN APTS APPELLANT(S) APPELLEE(S)

Judge: DEBRA IBARRA MAYFIELD I Appellant(s) Attorney: Appellee(s) Attorney: Smith, Pro Se Ernie #24072106 8405 Broadway #166 616 FM 1960 West, Suite 105 Houston, Texas 77061 Houston, Texas 77090 Phone: (832) 974-7529 Phone: (832) 305-7694 Fax: N/A Fax (832) 553-2984 N/A N/A

Kristan Smith, appellant, filed a of Appeal on 13, 2015 from the Final Judgment that was signed on January 5, 2015.

The Clerk’s Record is due to your office on or before 6, 2015.

/S/Joshua Alegria Joshua Alegria Deputy Clerk P.O. Box 1525 Houston, TX 77251-1525 (713)

1525 I TX 77251-1525 I (713)

1 1

1 I0

COURT NO.

DEFENDANT:

DATE: SIGNATURE:|

PRINT NAME:

ADDRESS: (STREET) (CITY) (STATE) (ZIP)

PHONE: N0. H-O1-60(Rcv.O1/01/2011)

2 A A A AA A

to be A best

at

3 "CLOSED" 1056192 NO. GLEN WOODLEN § INTHE APARTMENTS COUNTYCOURT CIVIL § v. ATLAWNo. 1

KRISTANSMITH § § HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS

FINAL JUDGMENT |ourt On thiscasefortrial.

Plaintiff, Woodlen Glen Apartments, throughits attorneyof record, and Defendant,

Kristan Smith, appeared, and both parties announced ready for trial.

The Court determined that it had over the parties and subject matter of this case.

The parties waived their rights to a trial byjury and submittedall in controversy,both

factual and legal, to the

TheCourthas consideredthepleadingsandrecordson inthiscauseandtheevidenceand

is of the opinion that judgment should be rendered for

It is accordingly ORDERED that |, Plaintiff, recover from Kristan

Smith, Defendant,judgment for-

1. Possession of the premises commonly known as 8405 Broadway # 166, Houston,

Texas 77061;

2. $ · · amount due in· back as the principal

3. $500.00 as fees;

4.Courtinthe costs of$111.00; amount &

4 ·

5. Interest at the rate of 5.00%, compounded from the date of this judgment,

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a writ of possession may issue on or after

2015. , IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the judgment of this court may not be stayed

within l0 days from this judgment the Defendant files a supersedeas bond in the amount of

pursuant to 24.007 of the Texas Property Code.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff is entitled to enforce this judgment through

abstract, execution, writ, and any other process.

This judgment disposes of all parties and all claims and is appealable.

o| Signed

JUDGE PRESIDING

' .

. _ O of or

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Kristan Smith v. Woodlen Glen Apartments, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kristan-smith-v-woodlen-glen-apartments-texapp-2015.