Kriss v. Silver Hill Hospital, No. Cv91 0121086 S (Oct. 2, 1995)

Connecticut Superior Court

Kriss v. Silver Hill Hospital, No. Cv91 0121086 S (Oct. 2, 1995)

1995 Conn. Super. Ct. 11489

CourtConnecticut Superior Court

DecidedOctober 2, 1995

DocketNo. CV91 0121086 S

StatusUnpublished

This text of 1995 Conn. Super. Ct. 11489 (Kriss v. Silver Hill Hospital, No. Cv91 0121086 S (Oct. 2, 1995)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kriss v. Silver Hill Hospital, No. Cv91 0121086 S (Oct. 2, 1995), 1995 Conn. Super. Ct. 11489 (Colo. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]MEMORANDUM OF DECISION This court will not rely upon the transcript of the plaintiff's deposition as support for the motion for summary CT Page 11490 judgment because the transcript is not certified; see Practice Book § 380; the transcript is not signed by the plaintiff and only portions of the transcript have been provided to the court. Therefore, the defendant has not met its burden of proof on summary judgment, which is to show "the absence of any genuine issue as to all the material facts, which, under the applicable principles of substantive law, entitle him to judgment as a matter of law." State v. Goggin, 208 Conn. 606, 615, 546 A.2d 250 (1988).

Furthermore, this court finds that genuine issues of material fact exist as to the contractual commitments between the plaintiff and the defendant. See Coelho v. Posi-SealInternational, Inc., 208 Conn. 106, 544 A.2d 170 (1988). Accordingly, the motion for summary judgment is denied.

D'ANDREA, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]MEMORANDUM OF DECISION This court will not rely upon the transcript of the plaintiff's deposition as support for the motion for summary CT Page 11490 judgment because the transcript is not certified; see Practice Book § 380; the transcript is not signed by the plaintiff and only portions of the transcript have been provided to the court. Therefore, the defendant has not met its burden of proof on summary judgment, which is to show "the absence of any genuine issue as to all the material facts, which, under the applicable principles of substantive law, entitle him to judgment as a matter of law." State v. Goggin, 208 Conn. 606, 615, 546 A.2d 250 (1988).

Furthermore, this court finds that genuine issues of material fact exist as to the contractual commitments between the plaintiff and the defendant. See Coelho v. Posi-SealInternational, Inc., 208 Conn. 106, 544 A.2d 170 (1988). Accordingly, the motion for summary judgment is denied.

D'ANDREA, J.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1995 Conn. Super. Ct. 11489, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kriss-v-silver-hill-hospital-no-cv91-0121086-s-oct-2-1995-connsuperct-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack