Krispy Kreme Doughnut Co. v. Pipkins
Opinion
The employer/carrier appeal a workers’ compensation order awarding permanent partial disability benefits based on loss of wage earning capacity. We agree with appellant’s contention that the order must be reversed because there is no finding of permanent anatomical impairment which is a prerequisite to an award based on wage earning capacity loss. Agrico Chemical Company v. Laws, 384 So.2d 722 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980). This requirement is not altered by the rule in Tropicana Pools Inc. v. Truex, 287 So.2d 71 (Fla.1973), that a deputy commissioner may assign a permanent impairment rating based on the testimony of the claimant, despite contradictory testimony by the treating physician.1
REVERSED AND REMANDED, to the deputy commissioner for further findings as directed by this opinion.
Footnotes
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
389 So. 2d 1243 (Krispy Kreme Doughnut Co. v. Pipkins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.