Krispy Kreme Doughnut Co. v. Pipkins

389 So. 2d 1243, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 18064
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 13, 1980
DocketNo. SS-289
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 389 So. 2d 1243 (Krispy Kreme Doughnut Co. v. Pipkins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Krispy Kreme Doughnut Co. v. Pipkins, 389 So. 2d 1243, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 18064 (Fla. Ct. App. 1980).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The employer/carrier appeal a workers’ compensation order awarding permanent partial disability benefits based on loss of wage earning capacity. We agree with appellant’s contention that the order must be reversed because there is no finding of permanent anatomical impairment which is a prerequisite to an award based on wage earning capacity loss. Agrico Chemical Company v. Laws, 384 So.2d 722 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980). This requirement is not altered by the rule in Tropicana Pools Inc. v. Truex, 287 So.2d 71 (Fla.1973), that a deputy commissioner may assign a permanent impairment rating based on the testimony of the claimant, despite contradictory testimony by the treating physician.1

REVERSED AND REMANDED, to the deputy commissioner for further findings as directed by this opinion.

[1244]*1244ERVIN, LARRY G. SMITH and SHIVERS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Entenmann's Bakery v. Smith
620 So. 2d 1049 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)
State v. McCall
406 So. 2d 1288 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
389 So. 2d 1243, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 18064, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/krispy-kreme-doughnut-co-v-pipkins-fladistctapp-1980.