Krispy Kreme Doughnut Co. v. Pipkins
This text of 389 So. 2d 1243 (Krispy Kreme Doughnut Co. v. Pipkins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The employer/carrier appeal a workers’ compensation order awarding permanent partial disability benefits based on loss of wage earning capacity. We agree with appellant’s contention that the order must be reversed because there is no finding of permanent anatomical impairment which is a prerequisite to an award based on wage earning capacity loss. Agrico Chemical Company v. Laws, 384 So.2d 722 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980). This requirement is not altered by the rule in Tropicana Pools Inc. v. Truex, 287 So.2d 71 (Fla.1973), that a deputy commissioner may assign a permanent impairment rating based on the testimony of the claimant, despite contradictory testimony by the treating physician.1
REVERSED AND REMANDED, to the deputy commissioner for further findings as directed by this opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
389 So. 2d 1243, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 18064, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/krispy-kreme-doughnut-co-v-pipkins-fladistctapp-1980.