Krisher v. Hogan

New York State Court of Claims

Krisher v. Hogan

23 Misc. 2d 110, 203 N.Y.S.2d 537, 1960 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2619

New York Court of Claims·Decided August 3, 1960·Published

Opinion

Sidney Squire, J.

Claimant’s motion for judgment against the defendant in the sum of $1,000,000 plus costs of $1,402.42 for “ Photostatic C'opies ” is denied because it is not in accordance with the practice in this court. No claim has been filed. The named defendant, “ Frank Hogan, District Attorney, New York County ’ ’, is not a proper defendant in this court of limited jurisdiction. Short-form order signed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sidney Squire, J.

Claimant’s motion for judgment against the defendant in the sum of $1,000,000 plus costs of $1,402.42 for “ Photostatic C'opies ” is denied because it is not in accordance with the practice in this court. No claim has been filed. The named defendant, “ Frank Hogan, District Attorney, New York County ’ ’, is not a proper defendant in this court of limited jurisdiction. Short-form order signed.

Krisher v. Hogan, 23 Misc. 2d 110, 203 N.Y.S.2d 537, 1960 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2619 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1960).

Pincite

23 Misc. 2d 110 (Krisher v. Hogan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.