Krischer v. Ford

847 So. 2d 1050, 2003 WL 21221327
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 28, 2003
Docket4D02-2283
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 847 So. 2d 1050 (Krischer v. Ford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Krischer v. Ford, 847 So. 2d 1050, 2003 WL 21221327 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinion

847 So.2d 1050 (2003)

Barry KRISCHER, State Attorney and the State of Florida, Appellants,
v.
Michael FORD, Appellee.

No. 4D02-2283.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

May 28, 2003.
Rehearing Denied July 10, 2003.

*1051 Charles J. Crist, Jr. Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Richard L. Polin, Assistant Attorney General, Miami, for appellants.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Ian Seldin, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The State appeals a trial court order, which granted the defendant's motion to enforce the plea agreement and ordered the release of the defendant from the "care, custody and control of Florida Department of Children and Families." The defendant had been held pursuant to a probable cause finding under the Jimmy Ryce Act. We treat this appeal as a petition for writ of certiorari. Satz v. Runion, 838 So.2d 689 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003); State v. Stapleton, 764 So.2d 886 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000); State v. Pettis, 520 So.2d 250 (Fla. 1988).

For the reasons set forth in Runion, we grant the petition and quash the trial court's order. See also Murray v. Regier, 27 Fla. L. Weekly S1008, ___ So.2d ___, 2002 WL 31728885 (Fla. Dec. 5, 2002); Krischer v. Faris, 838 So.2d 600 (Fla. 4th DCA2003).[1]

STONE, STEVENSON and MAY, JJ., concur.

NOTES

[1] We note the trial court did not have the benefit of Murray, Faris, and Runion when it ruled on the defendant's motion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Heath
895 So. 2d 1258 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)
State v. Ortega
891 So. 2d 623 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)
In Re Commitment of Ortega
891 So. 2d 623 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)
State v. Harris
881 So. 2d 1079 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
847 So. 2d 1050, 2003 WL 21221327, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/krischer-v-ford-fladistctapp-2003.