Kris Edward Helton v. Sec. for the Dept. of Corr.

Eleventh Circuit

Kris Edward Helton v. Sec. for the Dept. of Corr.

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

DecidedNovember 21, 2000

Docket00-10097

StatusPublished

This text of Kris Edward Helton v. Sec. for the Dept. of Corr. (Kris Edward Helton v. Sec. for the Dept. of Corr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kris Edward Helton v. Sec. for the Dept. of Corr., (11th Cir. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

[PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT JULY 17, 2001 No. 00-10097 THOMAS K. KAHN CLERK

D.C. Docket No. 99-10110-CIV-ROETTGER

KRIS EDWARD HELTON,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

SECRETARY FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida

(July 17, 2001)

Before TJOFLAT, HILL, and POLITZ*, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

The petition for rehearing filed by the Secretary for the Department of

Corrections is GRANTED. The panel’s prior opinion, Helton v. Secretary for the

Dep’t of Corrections, 233 F.3d 1322 (11th Cir. 2000), is hereby VACATED.

SO ORDERED.

___________________________________

*Honorable Henry A. Politz, U.S. Circuit Judge for the Fifth Circuit, sitting by designation.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI