Kripp v. Kripp

807 A.2d 830, 569 Pa. 608, 2002 Pa. LEXIS 2001
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided September 23, 2002·No. Appeal No. 847 MAL 2001·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 23rd day of September, 2002, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby GRANTED, LIMITED to the following issue:

Whether parol evidence should have been admitted to ascertain the parties’ intended definition of the term “cohabitation” in a property settlement agreement?
Justice EAKIN did not participate in the consideration of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kripp v. Kripp, 807 A.2d 830, 569 Pa. 608, 2002 Pa. LEXIS 2001 (Pa. 2002).

807 A.2d 830 (Kripp v. Kripp) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kripp v. Kripp
849 A.2d 1159 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2004)
Wineburgh v. Wineburgh
816 A.2d 1105 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2002)