Kripp v. Kripp

807 A.2d 830, 569 Pa. 608, 2002 Pa. LEXIS 2001
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedSeptember 23, 2002
DocketAppeal No. 847 MAL 2001
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 807 A.2d 830 (Kripp v. Kripp) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kripp v. Kripp, 807 A.2d 830, 569 Pa. 608, 2002 Pa. LEXIS 2001 (Pa. 2002).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 23rd day of September, 2002, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby GRANTED, LIMITED to the following issue:

Whether parol evidence should have been admitted to ascertain the parties’ intended definition of the term “cohabitation” in a property settlement agreement?
Justice EAKIN did not participate in the consideration of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kripp v. Kripp
849 A.2d 1159 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2004)
Wineburgh v. Wineburgh
816 A.2d 1105 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
807 A.2d 830, 569 Pa. 608, 2002 Pa. LEXIS 2001, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kripp-v-kripp-pa-2002.