Krinbill v. Rochester Railway Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Krinbill v. Rochester Railway Co.

120 A.D. 898, 105 N.Y.S. 1126

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 15, 1907

StatusPublished

This text of 120 A.D. 898 (Krinbill v. Rochester Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Krinbill v. Rochester Railway Co., 120 A.D. 898, 105 N.Y.S. 1126 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1907).

Pincite

Opinion

— Order reversed and'new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event. Held, that any negligence of the person in charge of the horses in leaving them unhitched and unattended was imputable to the plaintiff, and that leaving the horses unhitched and unattended under the circumstances disclosed by the evidence in the casé was sufficient to require the question of contributory negligence to-be-submitted to the jury. All concurred; Robson, J., not sitting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Order reversed and'new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event. Held, that any negligence of the person in charge of the horses in leaving them unhitched and unattended was imputable to the plaintiff, and that leaving the horses unhitched and unattended under the circumstances disclosed by the evidence in the casé was sufficient to require the question of contributory negligence to-be-submitted to the jury. All concurred; Robson, J., not sitting.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

120 A.D. 898, 105 N.Y.S. 1126, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/krinbill-v-rochester-railway-co-nyappdiv-1907.