Kriete v. Safir

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Kriete v. Safir

11 A.D.3d 205, 782 N.Y.S.2d 268, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11515

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 5, 2004

StatusPublished

This text of 11 A.D.3d 205 (Kriete v. Safir) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kriete v. Safir, 11 A.D.3d 205, 782 N.Y.S.2d 268, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11515 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

[206]*206Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Marcy S. Friedman, J.), entered March 10, 2003, which denied the petition brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 to annul administrative determinations, dated December 8, 1999 and January 12, 2000, that petitioner was not entitled to accident disability retirement benefits, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Credible evidence supported the Medical Board’s finding that petitioner’s chronic condition of hepatitis C did not amount to grounds for disability retirement because it did not disable him from fully performing his duties as a police officer (Matter of Borenstein v New York City Employees’ Retirement Sys., 88 NY2d 756, 761 [1996]). Furthermore, the evidence conclusively established that petitioner’s allegations of post-traumatic stress disorder did not arise out of a line-of-duty incident. Concur— Buckley, P.J., Mazzarelli, Saxe, Ellerin and Gonzalez, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[206]*206Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Marcy S. Friedman, J.), entered March 10, 2003, which denied the petition brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 to annul administrative determinations, dated December 8, 1999 and January 12, 2000, that petitioner was not entitled to accident disability retirement benefits, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Credible evidence supported the Medical Board’s finding that petitioner’s chronic condition of hepatitis C did not amount to grounds for disability retirement because it did not disable him from fully performing his duties as a police officer (Matter of Borenstein v New York City Employees’ Retirement Sys., 88 NY2d 756, 761 [1996]). Furthermore, the evidence conclusively established that petitioner’s allegations of post-traumatic stress disorder did not arise out of a line-of-duty incident. Concur— Buckley, P.J., Mazzarelli, Saxe, Ellerin and Gonzalez, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

11 A.D.3d 205, 782 N.Y.S.2d 268, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11515, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kriete-v-safir-nyappdiv-2004.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack