Kriesak v. Crowe
This text of 131 F.2d 1023 (Kriesak v. Crowe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Upon this appeal the sole question is whether there was sufficient evidence that the injuries to the plaintiff’s decedent resulted from the negligence of the defendant to support the verdict of the jury in favor of the plaintiff. We have carefully examined the evidence, the recital of which here would serve no useful purpose, and we are satisfied that the district court was right in holding it sufficient to support the verdict. It follows that the court committed no error in denying the defendant’s motion to set aside the verdict and for judgment in his favor.
The judgment, 44 F.Supp. 636, is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
131 F.2d 1023, 1942 U.S. App. LEXIS 3018, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kriesak-v-crowe-ca3-1942.