Krieger v. Warner Computer Systems, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Krieger v. Warner Computer Systems, Inc.

87 A.D.2d 763, 449 N.Y.S.2d 51, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16196

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 13, 1982

StatusPublished

This text of 87 A.D.2d 763 (Krieger v. Warner Computer Systems, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Krieger v. Warner Computer Systems, Inc., 87 A.D.2d 763, 449 N.Y.S.2d 51, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16196 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Tyler, J.), entered November 6, 1981, denying the motion of defendants in Action No. 2 to dismiss the complaint, unanimously modified, on the law, by directing that Warner Computer Systems, Inc. be joined as a party defendant in Action No. 2, and, as modified, affirmed, without costs. The plaintiffs in Action No. 2 request, alternatively, that the disputed shares be transferred to Warner Computer Systems, Inc. Since Warner’s interest in the disputed shares is adverse to the personal interest in those shares of Alan, Gerald and Harvey Krieger, that corporation should be joined as a necessary party defendant to protect its interest. (CPLR 1001, subd [a]; 1003.) Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Tyler, J.), entered on or about December 4, 1981, granting plaintiffs’ application for consolidation of Action Nos. 1 and 2 to the extent of ordering a joint trial of said actions, unanimously affirmed, with costs. Concur — Murphy, P. J., Ross, Lupiano, Fein and Lynch, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Tyler, J.), entered November 6, 1981, denying the motion of defendants in Action No. 2 to dismiss the complaint, unanimously modified, on the law, by directing that Warner Computer Systems, Inc. be joined as a party defendant in Action No. 2, and, as modified, affirmed, without costs. The plaintiffs in Action No. 2 request, alternatively, that the disputed shares be transferred to Warner Computer Systems, Inc. Since Warner’s interest in the disputed shares is adverse to the personal interest in those shares of Alan, Gerald and Harvey Krieger, that corporation should be joined as a necessary party defendant to protect its interest. (CPLR 1001, subd [a]; 1003.) Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Tyler, J.), entered on or about December 4, 1981, granting plaintiffs’ application for consolidation of Action Nos. 1 and 2 to the extent of ordering a joint trial of said actions, unanimously affirmed, with costs. Concur — Murphy, P. J., Ross, Lupiano, Fein and Lynch, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

87 A.D.2d 763, 449 N.Y.S.2d 51, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16196, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/krieger-v-warner-computer-systems-inc-nyappdiv-1982.