Krieger v. Virginia
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Roy Walter Krieger appeals the district court’s order accepting in part and rejecting in part the magistrate judge’s recommendation and dismissing Krieger’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint with prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Krieger v. Commonwealth of Va., Dep’t of Soc. Servs., No. 5:13-cv-00073-MFU-JGW (W.D.Va. Sept. 30, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
599 F. App'x 112 (Krieger v. Virginia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.