Krieger v. Power

New York Court of Appeals

Krieger v. Power

218 N.E.2d 911, 17 N.Y.2d 930, 272 N.Y.S.2d 149, 1966 N.Y. LEXIS 1261

DecidedJune 21, 1966

StatusPublished

This text of 218 N.E.2d 911 (Krieger v. Power) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Krieger v. Power, 218 N.E.2d 911, 17 N.Y.2d 930, 272 N.Y.S.2d 149, 1966 N.Y. LEXIS 1261 (N.Y. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

Order affirmed, without costs.. Appellant lacks standing to test the constitutionality of subdivision 4 of section 15 of the Election Law for the reason that he does not reside in any former assembly district any portion of which is comprised by the new assembly district resulting from the recent reapportionment.

Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Fuld, Van Voorhis, Burke, Scileppi, Bebgan and Keating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order affirmed, without costs.. Appellant lacks standing to test the constitutionality of subdivision 4 of section 15 of the Election Law for the reason that he does not reside in any former assembly district any portion of which is comprised by the new assembly district resulting from the recent reapportionment.

Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Fuld, Van Voorhis, Burke, Scileppi, Bebgan and Keating.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

218 N.E.2d 911, 17 N.Y.2d 930, 272 N.Y.S.2d 149, 1966 N.Y. LEXIS 1261, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/krieger-v-power-ny-1966.