Krieger v. Lanark LJS LLC.

125 N.E.3d 798, 95 Mass. App. Ct. 1111
Massachusetts Appeals Court·Decided May 3, 2019·No. 17-P-334·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

So much of the judgment that ordered the plaintiffs to bring a separate action for damages for the value of the encroachment is vacated. The matter is remanded for a determination of damages on the value of the encroachment. The remainder of the judgment is affirmed. The order denying motion to alter or amend the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Krieger v. Lanark LJS LLC., 125 N.E.3d 798, 95 Mass. App. Ct. 1111 (Mass. Ct. App. 2019).

125 N.E.3d 798 (Krieger v. Lanark LJS LLC.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

STASA v. PADIS, Jr.
Massachusetts Land Court, 2021