Home/New York Court of Appeals/Krieger v. Krieger

Krieger v. Krieger

263 N.E.2d 389, 27 N.Y.2d 741, 314 N.Y.S.2d 990, 1970 N.Y. LEXIS 1092
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedSeptember 24, 1970
StatusPublished

This text of 263 N.E.2d 389 (Krieger v. Krieger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Krieger v. Krieger, 263 N.E.2d 389, 27 N.Y.2d 741, 314 N.Y.S.2d 990, 1970 N.Y. LEXIS 1092 (N.Y. 1970).

Opinion

Motion to amend remittitur denied. Form of judgment to be entered on remittitur lies within jurisdiction of Supreme Court but, in general, dismissal of complaint does not fully meet requirements of proper action for declaratory judgment (Bookland Light & Power Co. v. City of New York, 289 N. Y. 45) and judgment to be entered should follow remittitur in present case literally. [See 25 N Y 2d 364.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rockland Light and Power Co. v. City of New York
43 N.E.2d 803 (New York Court of Appeals, 1942)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
263 N.E.2d 389, 27 N.Y.2d 741, 314 N.Y.S.2d 990, 1970 N.Y. LEXIS 1092, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/krieger-v-krieger-ny-1970.