Kriebel v. Kriebel

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Kriebel v. Kriebel

779 A.2d 1151

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Kriebel v. Kriebel. Read the opinion of the Court — 571 Pa. 356 →

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided September 7, 2001·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 7th day of September, 2001, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED to the question of whether the Parental Kidnapping Prevention Act (28 U.S.C. § 1738A) is the controlling authority in determining whether Pennsylvania has continuing jurisdiction over a custody matter, where Pennsylvania courts had initial jurisdiction, but the custodial parent has moved the children to another state and the non-custodial parent remains in Pennsylvania.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 7th day of September, 2001, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED to the question of whether the Parental Kidnapping Prevention Act (28 U.S.C. § 1738A) is the controlling authority in determining whether Pennsylvania has continuing jurisdiction over a custody matter, where Pennsylvania courts had initial jurisdiction, but the custodial parent has moved the children to another state and the non-custodial parent remains in Pennsylvania.

Kriebel v. Kriebel, 779 A.2d 1151 (Pa. 2001).

Pincite

779 A.2d 1151 (Kriebel v. Kriebel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related