Krichbaum v. Kelley

61 F.3d 900, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 26528, 1995 WL 449668
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJuly 31, 1995
Docket94-1496
StatusUnpublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 61 F.3d 900 (Krichbaum v. Kelley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Krichbaum v. Kelley, 61 F.3d 900, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 26528, 1995 WL 449668 (4th Cir. 1995).

Opinion

61 F.3d 900

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Steven KRICHBAUM, Plaintiff--Appellant,
and
Shay CLANTON; Kim Clanton, Plaintiffs,
v.
George Wayne KELLEY, in his official capacity as Forest
Supervisor of the George Washington National
Forest; United States Forest Service;
Deeds Brothers, Incorporated,
Defendants--Appellees.

No. 94-1496.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted May 31, 1995.
Decided July 31, 1995.

Steven Krichbaum, Appellant Pro Se. Vicki Laine Plaut, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, DC; John Ebersole, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, Atlanta, GA; Michael McHale Collins, COLLINS & MOONEY, Covington, VA, for Appellees.

Before MURNAGHAN and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order granting summary judgment in favor of the Defendants. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Krichbaum v. Kelley, No. CA-93-103-H (W.D.Va. Feb. 17, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Golden v. Barnett
N.D. West Virginia, 2018
Krichbaum v. U.S. Forest Service
17 F. Supp. 2d 549 (W.D. Virginia, 1998)
Sierra Club v. Martin
992 F. Supp. 1448 (N.D. Georgia, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
61 F.3d 900, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 26528, 1995 WL 449668, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/krichbaum-v-kelley-ca4-1995.