Krey v. Sarah Land Co.
This text of 470 P.2d 154 (Krey v. Sarah Land Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Plaintiff appeals from an adverse judgment in her action of ejectment claiming the court erred in fail[32]*32ing to submit tbe issue of punitive damages to the jury and for fading to order a new trial. Tbe issue of punitive damage is moot because the jury refused to allow compensatory damages. See Martin v. Cambas, 1930, 134 Or 257, 261, 293 P 601, and Hodel, Exemplary Damages in Oregon, 1965, 44 Or L Rev 175, at 229. The fadure to grant a motion for a new trial is not appealable. Shearer v. Lantz, 1957, 210 Or 632, 312 P2d 581.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
470 P.2d 154, 256 Or. 31, 1970 Ore. LEXIS 445, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/krey-v-sarah-land-co-or-1970.