Krewer v. Colavolpe
14 A.D.2d 776, 219 N.Y.S.2d 991, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8774
Opinion
In our opinion, under the circumstances here, the denial of the motion was an improvident exercise of discretion (cf. Surrogate’s Ct. Act, § 40; Matter of Poth, 155 Misc. 116; Shearn v. Lord, 16 Misc 2d 224, affd. 3 A D 2d 823). Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Ughetta, Kleinfeld and Christ, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Krewer v. Colavolpe, 14 A.D.2d 776, 219 N.Y.S.2d 991, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8774 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1961).
14 A.D.2d 776 (Krewer v. Colavolpe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re the Estate of Poth
155 Misc. 116 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1935)
Shearn v. Lord
16 Misc. 2d 224 (New York Supreme Court, 1956)