Kressman v. Shangle
This text of 548 P.2d 641 (Kressman v. Shangle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[217]*217OPINION
This appeal involves title to certain land located in Eureka County.
The Record on Appeal in this case was filed in May, 1975. Oral argument is set for May, 1976. Respondent was required, under NRAP 31(a), as amended, to file the answering brief on or before September 27, 1975. The brief has not been filed; furthermore, there has been no explanation tendered for the failure to do so.
Under these circumstances and for the same reasons stated in, and on the authority of, Kitchen Factors, Inc. v. Brown, 91 Nev. 308, 535 P.2d 677 (1975), we elect to treat respondent’s unexplained and unexcused omission as a confession of error and, sua sponte, reverse the judgment of the district court. NRAP 31(c). See also, Grogan v. County of Esmeralda, 91 Nev. 728, 541 P.2d 1101 (1975).
This case is remanded to the district court with instructions to enter judgment permitting appellant to obtain a reconveyance of the land in question upon payment of applicable taxes, interest, penalties and costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
548 P.2d 641, 92 Nev. 216, 1976 Nev. LEXIS 570, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kressman-v-shangle-nev-1976.