KRENZER v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

KRENZER v. State

290 S.W.3d 157, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1160, 2009 WL 2431459

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 11, 2009·No. WD 69571·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Brian Krenzer appeals the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 29.15 motion for postconviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. He sought to vacate his conviction for second-degree robbery, section 569.030, RSMo 2000, and sentence as a persistent offender to twenty-five years imprisonment. Mr. Krenzer claims that he was provided ineffective assistance of counsel regarding various ev-identiary issues. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.

The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Brian Krenzer appeals the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 29.15 motion for postconviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. He sought to vacate his conviction for second-degree robbery, section 569.030, RSMo 2000, and sentence as a persistent offender to twenty-five years imprisonment. Mr. Krenzer claims that he was provided ineffective assistance of counsel regarding various ev-identiary issues. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.

The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

KRENZER v. State, 290 S.W.3d 157, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1160, 2009 WL 2431459 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

290 S.W.3d 157 (KRENZER v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related