Krendel Vs. Perez

• Court: Nevada Supreme Court
• Decided: February 14, 2020
• Docket: 79174
• Status: Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

CARL SPENCER KRENDEL, No. 79174 Appellant, vs. FILED SANTOS PEREZ, Respondent. FEB 1 4 2020

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

This is a pro se appeal from a judgment on an arbitration award. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Rob Bare, Judge. This appeal was docketed on July 16, 2019, and this court issued a notice informing appellant of the filing deadlines on that date. Pursuant to the notice, the opening brief or informal brief for parties acting in pro se was due to be filed by November 13, 2019. When appellant failed to file a brief, this court entered an order, on January 13, 2020, directing appellant to file a brief on or before January 21, 2020. This court cautioned appellant that failure to comply with the court's order could result in dismissal of the appeal. To date appellant has not filed the brief and has not otherwise communicated with this court. Accordingly, this court concludes that appellant has abandoned this appeal and ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.

, J. Hardesty Cadish

'A copy of this order is attached. SummE Com* OF NEVADA

(0) I947A 4114. 2z-oul-vo cc: Hon. Rob Bare, District Judge Carl Spencer Krendel Chavez Legal Group Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) 1947A 2 -011!1111• f IN THE SUPREME COURt-OTFTHE STATE OF NEVADA

• CARL SPENCER KRENDEL, 140,.,791-44 Appellant, vs. FILED SANTOS PEItEZ, Rspondt Olt 2ri IIROWItt ()EDER CLEF% A pellant filed the notice d appeal on J IC49, and this

court issued .a 'notice informing appellant of the deadlines in this appeet- Pursuant to the notice, the openingbriet oriliformalbrief fOivg_rties acting in-pm-46 vas due tii-hefilect tor NOventber 13, 2019. Ttia-datiamellarit ha 1- n9t fdedythelhriet..Appellantiahall have I- days from-the datevftbis order to 'file either an• opening brief that complies with the- requirements of NRAP 28(a) and NRAP 32 or the "infonxisthrief for pro se partieerrovided by this court. Failure to coMply timely with thia order niay result in the disiniasaT of this appeal. NRAP 31.(d). Respondent need not file a response to -tt* ..Opening brief unless directed to'do so by this court. NRAP 46A(c). It is to ORDERED.

, C.J.

cc: Carl Spencer Krendel Chavez Legal Group