Krendel v. Perez

• Court: Nevada Supreme Court
• Decided: May 22, 2019
• Docket: 78527
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

CARL SPENCER KRENDEL, No. 78527 Appellant, V S. SANTOS PEREZ, Resoondent. FILE MAY 2 2 2019 Enz/A. BROWN CLEROF REME cktn: BY EPUTY CLERK

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

This is a pro se appeal from a district court order striking a request for trial de novo. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Rob Bare, Judge. Review of the notice of appeal and documents before this court reveals a jurisdictional defect. An order striking a request for trial de novo is subject to review on appeal from an order entering judgment in accordance with an arbitration award. NAR 18(F). Here, however, it does not appear that the district court has entered a judgment on the arbitration award. Thus, the order is not appealable under NAR 18(F). As no other statute or rule appears to permit an appeal from the challenged order, this court lacks jurisdiction, see Brown v. MHC Stagecoach, LLG 129 Nev. 343, SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) I94Th /et - 2233-2, 345, 301 P.3d 850, 851 (2013) (this court "may only consider appeals authorized by statute or court rule"), and ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.'

Stiglich Silver

cc: Hon. Rob Bare, District Judge Carl Spencer Krendel Chavez Legal Group Eighth District Court Clerk

'Appellant may file a new notice of appeal once a judgment on the arbitration award is entered. SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

101 1947A ce. 2