Kremer v. Kremer
267 A.D. 815, 47 N.Y.S.2d 104, 1944 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4897
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Kremer v. Kremer. Read the opinion of the Court — 269 A.D. 827 →
Opinion
While the disposition made at Special Term might after a hearing prove to have been correct, we believe that on the facts alleged where the immediate welfare of an infant is involved the issue should not have been decided without a hearing. Order unanimously reversed, without costs, and the matter remitted to Special Term for the purpose of affording the parties an opportunity to present their proofs. Present — Martin, P. J., Glennon, Untermyer, Dore and Callahan, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kremer v. Kremer, 267 A.D. 815, 47 N.Y.S.2d 104, 1944 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4897 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1944).
267 A.D. 815 (Kremer v. Kremer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.