Kremens v. Kremens

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Kremens v. Kremens

43 A.D.2d 530, 349 N.Y.S.2d 642, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3132

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 15, 1973

StatusPublished

This text of 43 A.D.2d 530 (Kremens v. Kremens) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kremens v. Kremens, 43 A.D.2d 530, 349 N.Y.S.2d 642, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3132 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered June 20, 1973, unanimously modified, on the law, on the facts and in the exercise of discretion, to the extent of granting defendant a counsel fee of $1,000, payable one half within 20 days after service upon respondent by appellant of a copy of the order entered hereon, with notice of entry, and the balance when the case first appears on the Trial Calendar, and, except as so modified, the order is otherwise affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. On the record before us, though we find sufficient basis for the denial of temporary alimony, we believe defendant [531]*531wife is entitled to counsel fees to enable her to defend the allegations made against her and to establish her counterclaims. Concur — McGivern, J. P., Nunez, Murphy, Steuer and Tilzer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered June 20, 1973, unanimously modified, on the law, on the facts and in the exercise of discretion, to the extent of granting defendant a counsel fee of $1,000, payable one half within 20 days after service upon respondent by appellant of a copy of the order entered hereon, with notice of entry, and the balance when the case first appears on the Trial Calendar, and, except as so modified, the order is otherwise affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. On the record before us, though we find sufficient basis for the denial of temporary alimony, we believe defendant [531]*531wife is entitled to counsel fees to enable her to defend the allegations made against her and to establish her counterclaims. Concur — McGivern, J. P., Nunez, Murphy, Steuer and Tilzer, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

43 A.D.2d 530, 349 N.Y.S.2d 642, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3132, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kremens-v-kremens-nyappdiv-1973.