Kremens v. Bartley
429 U.S. 957, 97 S. Ct. 377
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Kremens v. Bartley. Read the opinion of the Court — 431 U.S. 119 →
Opinion
Appeal from D. C. E. D. Pa. [Probable jurisdiction noted, 424 U. S. 964.] Motion of Bernard G. Segal, Esquire, on behalf of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, for additional time to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae denied. Alternative request for divided argument granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kremens v. Bartley, 429 U.S. 957, 97 S. Ct. 377 (1976).
429 U.S. 957 (Kremens v. Bartley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.