Kremelberg v. Thompson

103 A. 523, 87 N.J. Eq. 655, 2 Stock. 655, 1917 N.J. LEXIS 472
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided July 13, 1917·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Tlie decree appealed from will be affirmed, for - the reasons ■stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor ..Stevens.

For affirmance—Garrison, Swayze, Trenchard, Bergen, Black, White,. Heppeniieimer, Williams, Taylor, Gardner—10. - For reversal—Minturn, Kalisci-i—2.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kremelberg v. Thompson, 103 A. 523, 87 N.J. Eq. 655, 2 Stock. 655, 1917 N.J. LEXIS 472 (N.J. 1917).

103 A. 523 (Kremelberg v. Thompson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Estate of McCubbin
465 N.E.2d 672 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1984)
Magee v. Pope
112 S.W.2d 891 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1938)
O'Rear v. Commissioner
28 B.T.A. 698 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1933)
Rotan v. United States
43 F.2d 232 (S.D. Texas, 1930)