Krell v. S & F Towing

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Krell v. S & F Towing

82 A.D.3d 715, 917 N.Y.2d 893

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 1, 2011

StatusPublished

This text of 82 A.D.3d 715 (Krell v. S & F Towing) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Krell v. S & F Towing, 82 A.D.3d 715, 917 N.Y.2d 893 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

The Supreme Court properly granted that branch of the motion of the defendants S & F Towing and William Stetter (hereinafter together the defendants) which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them. The defendants demonstrated, prima facie, that they were not negligent and, in opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact.

The plaintiff’s remaining contentions are without merit. Covello, J.E, Chambers, Lott and Cohen, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Supreme Court properly granted that branch of the motion of the defendants S & F Towing and William Stetter (hereinafter together the defendants) which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them. The defendants demonstrated, prima facie, that they were not negligent and, in opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact.

The plaintiff’s remaining contentions are without merit. Covello, J.E, Chambers, Lott and Cohen, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

82 A.D.3d 715, 917 N.Y.2d 893, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/krell-v-s-f-towing-nyappdiv-2011.